Most Accurate Clock


A new optical clock that is twice as accurate as any other has been unveiled by physicists in the US. The clock, which is based on a single aluminium ion, could remain accurate to within one second over3.7 billion years. The previous record was held by a clock with one mercury ion, which was good to one second in 1.7 billion years.This clock use a different principle quantum-interference protocol which makes it more accurate. Very soon this will be replacing our atomic clocks.

Stability is a must

An optical clock has three main components. The first is a highly stable “reference” frequency provided by a narrow optical absorption line in an atom or ion. The second element is a feedback system that “locks” the output of a laser (called the local oscillator) to the reference frequency. The third component provides a very precise
measurement of the frequency of the laser – usually with a “femtosecond comb”.

The most important component, however, is the atom or ion itself – which must absorb light over an extremely narrow and extremely stable frequency range. To ensure this, the atom or ion is isolated in a vacuum chamber and cooled to near absolute zero using laser beams –whereby light is absorbed and reemitted by the ion in such a way as to reduce its kinetic energy.

(JILA’s strontium atomic clock is now the world’s most accurate clock based on neutral atoms. Credit: Greg Kuebler/JILA)

Aluminium ions are relatively easy to isolate from their surroundings – particularly from the effects of black-body radiation from the surrounding chamber. Unfortunately, aluminium ions are very hard to cool with laser light because they re-emit the absorbed radiation at a much lower frequency. This also makes it tricky to
design a feedback mechanism to keep the laser locked on to the reference frequency.

James Chin-wen Chou, David Wineland and colleagues at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in Colorado have got around this problem by pairing the aluminium with a second ion of magnesium, which is easy to cool. The team begins by trapping the magnesium ion using electric fields and then cooling it using a laser. They then introduce the aluminium ion into the chamber, which interacts with the magnesium via electrical forces. These interactions allow the team to chill the aluminium ion using “sympathetic cooling”.

Quantum logic measurement

The local-oscillator laser is then fired at the aluminium ion and the efficiency at which the ion absorbs the light is determined by a technique called quantum logic spectroscopy (QLS). QLS is possible because the ions are just a few microns apart and therefore they behave as a quantum system – the result being that the absorption efficiency of the aluminium ion can be determined from light emitted from the magnesium ion. The greater the absorption efficiency, the closer the match between the aluminium ion’s reference frequency and the local-oscillator laser – and this is used in a feedback loop to tune the laser to the ion.

The team first applied QLS to an optical clock in 2008, when it created a similar device using aluminium and beryllium (Al-Be) ions that had an uncertainty of about 2.3 × 10–17. By using magnesium and a new type of ion trap, the team has improved by this nearly a factor of three to 8.6 × 10–18. This shatters the previous record for precision – 1.9 × 10–17 – which was held by NIST’s mercury ion clock.

The team was also able to compare the output of the new aluminium-magnesium clock with the older Al-Be clock to understand the differences between the two devices. Such comparisons are important if several optical clocks are deployed around the world – as is the case with standard atomic clocks.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s