<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ScienceTech4u</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sciencetech4u.wordpress.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sciencetech4u.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2011 18:30:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='sciencetech4u.wordpress.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://sciencetech4u.wordpress.com/osd.xml" title="ScienceTech4u" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://sciencetech4u.wordpress.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Most Accurate Clock</title>
		<link>http://sciencetech4u.wordpress.com/2011/12/22/most-accurate-clock/</link>
		<comments>http://sciencetech4u.wordpress.com/2011/12/22/most-accurate-clock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 04:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sciencetech4u</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sciencetech4u.wordpress.com/?p=4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new optical clock that is twice as accurate as any other has been unveiled by physicists in the US. The clock, which is based on a singlealuminium ion, could remain accurate to within one second over3.7 billion years. The previous record was held by a clock with onemercury ion, which was good to one [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=sciencetech4u.wordpress.com&amp;blog=13616734&amp;post=4&amp;subd=sciencetech4u&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new optical clock that is twice as accurate as any other has been unveiled by physicists in the US. The clock, which is based on a singlealuminium ion, could remain accurate to within one second over3.7 billion years. The previous record was held by a clock with onemercury ion, which was good to one second in 1.7 billion years.This clock usee a different principle quantum-interference protocol which makes it more accurate. Very soon this will be replacing our atomic clocks.</p>
<h3><img class="alignnone" title="Accurate Clock" src="http://images.iop.org/objects/phw/news/14/2/19/alu1.jpg" alt="" width="450" height="800" /></h3>
<h3>Stability is a must</h3>
<p>An optical clock has three main components. The first is a highly stable &#8220;reference&#8221; frequency provided by a narrow optical absorption line in an atom or ion. The second element is a feedback system that<br />
&#8220;locks&#8221; the output of a laser (called the local oscillator) to the<br />
reference frequency. The third component provides a very precise<br />
measurement of the frequency of the laser – usually with a &#8220;femtosecond<br />
comb&#8221;.</p>
<p>The most important component, however, is the atom or ion itself – which must absorb light over an extremely narrow and extremely stable frequency range. To ensure this, the atom or ion is isolated in<br />
a vacuum chamber and cooled to near absolute zero using laser beams –<br />
whereby light is absorbed and reemitted by the ion in such a way as to<br />
reduce its kinetic energy.</p>
<p><img src="http://api.ning.com/files/6Y3T0pu95TGtLvnCNR1VfsfVNQhMwaGceW3D4doaEViEEXLWl4zq-pOCUwfL1EAF9z3ocKLSrMQylhfhgY9q7HSut8IfGrgo/collaboratio.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p><em>(JILA&#8217;s strontium atomic clock is now the world&#8217;s most accurate clock based on neutral atoms. Credit: Greg Kuebler/JILA)</em></p>
<p>Aluminium ions are relatively easy to isolate from their surroundings – particularly from the effects of black-body radiation from the surrounding chamber. Unfortunately, aluminium ions are very<br />
hard to cool with laser light because they re-emit the absorbed<br />
radiation at a much lower frequency. This also makes it tricky to<br />
design a feedback mechanism to keep the laser locked on to the<br />
reference frequency.</p>
<p>James Chin-wen Chou, David Wineland and colleagues at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in Colorado have got around this problem by pairing the aluminium with a second ion of magnesium, which is easy to cool. The<br />
team begins by trapping the magnesium ion using electric fields and<br />
then cooling it using a laser. They then introduce the aluminium ion<br />
into the chamber, which interacts with the magnesium via electrical<br />
forces. These interactions allow the team to chill the aluminium ion<br />
using &#8220;sympathetic cooling&#8221;.</p>
<h3>Quantum logic measurement</h3>
<p>The local-oscillator laser is then fired at the aluminium ion and the efficiency at which the ion absorbs the light is determined by a technique called quantum logic spectroscopy (QLS). QLS is possible<br />
because the ions are just a few microns apart and therefore they behave<br />
as a quantum system – the result being that the absorption efficiency<br />
of the aluminium ion can be determined from light emitted from the<br />
magnesium ion. The greater the absorption efficiency, the closer the<br />
match between the aluminium ion&#8217;s reference frequency and the<br />
local-oscillator laser – and this is used in a feedback loop to tune<br />
the laser to the ion.</p>
<p>The team first applied QLS to an optical clock in 2008, when it created a similar device using aluminium and beryllium (Al-Be) ions that had an uncertainty of about 2.3 × 10<sup>–17</sup>. By using magnesium and a new type of ion trap, the team has improved by this nearly a factor of three to 8.6 × 10<sup>–18</sup>. This shatters the previous record for precision – 1.9 × 10<sup>–17</sup> – which was held by NIST&#8217;s mercury ion clock.</p>
<p>The team was also able to compare the output of the new aluminium-magnesium clock with the older Al-Be clock to understand the differences between the two devices. Such comparisons are important if<br />
several optical clocks are deployed around the world – as is the case<br />
with standard atomic clocks.</p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/sciencetech4u.wordpress.com/4/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/sciencetech4u.wordpress.com/4/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/sciencetech4u.wordpress.com/4/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/sciencetech4u.wordpress.com/4/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/sciencetech4u.wordpress.com/4/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/sciencetech4u.wordpress.com/4/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/sciencetech4u.wordpress.com/4/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/sciencetech4u.wordpress.com/4/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/sciencetech4u.wordpress.com/4/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/sciencetech4u.wordpress.com/4/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/sciencetech4u.wordpress.com/4/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/sciencetech4u.wordpress.com/4/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/sciencetech4u.wordpress.com/4/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/sciencetech4u.wordpress.com/4/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=sciencetech4u.wordpress.com&amp;blog=13616734&amp;post=4&amp;subd=sciencetech4u&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sciencetech4u.wordpress.com/2011/12/22/most-accurate-clock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/73adda2524be1f0ecdf827345f4a2e07?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">sciencetech4u</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://images.iop.org/objects/phw/news/14/2/19/alu1.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Accurate Clock</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://api.ning.com/files/6Y3T0pu95TGtLvnCNR1VfsfVNQhMwaGceW3D4doaEViEEXLWl4zq-pOCUwfL1EAF9z3ocKLSrMQylhfhgY9q7HSut8IfGrgo/collaboratio.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
